Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
July 05 2010
Plastic Antibodies Save the Lives of Mice, Are Humans Next? | Singularity Hub
"Science is more fun when it’s slightly confusing."April 03 2009
"Marx was Right!" - Boing Boing
The idea of economic value is too multi-valent and arises in too many differing situations(IMO) to be amenable to a "one-size-fits-all" theory (similar to attempted 'general' definitions of property: in the final analysis, "property" is what others allow as one to treat as "property"). Functional definitions may come closest to capturing all the particular examples of either 'value' or 'property': but IMHO any general definition of these words will miss some instances. In addition, I am not convinced that such general definitions are of any analytical or synthetical use. How would a general definition of "value" or "property" help in understanding the economy? From what I see, such exercises serve to "bake-in" assumptions: which defeats the very end of the inquiry, at the outset. A political debating trick.
Older posts are this way
If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.
